Skip to main content

The Big Advantage Horror Board Games Have Over Other Spooky Media



Hey!  Sorry it's been a while since my last post.  Between the holidays, general life, being sick, etc... it's been a long month. 

Also, sorry that this isn't Star Wars related, but with TLJ coming out in the next few weeks I assure you I'll have plenty more Star Wars content in December- including, finally, a gallery of all my painted stuff.

Now, let's get down to business- and honestly, this article would've been way more appropriate a month ago, but whatever. 

 One thing I've thinking about since Halloween time is the nature of horror.  See, from what I can tell, the big obstacle that horror films typically have is that they are meant to illicit only one emotion: fear.  Or, rather, that's the only expectation that fans have going into a horror film, when reading a scary story, or when playing a horror video game.  "Fear" is almost synonymous with "horror", and that rush of adrenaline is why some of us like the genre while some immediately write it off.

Personally, though, I think that this reliance on fear has caused a lot of issues for the genre. Some movies try to overcome this by inserting a lot of humor into their films, as that seems to go pretty hand in hand with horror, creating a bit of a rollercoaster of emotion rather than a flat desert highway.  Sometimes this works pretty well (Cabin in the Woods, Zombieland), and sometimes it comes across pretty campy (the Leprechaun movies, Chuckie).  This year's remake of IT also comes to mind when I think of cross-genre horror films.  I guess it comes across as vain if I quote myself, but I'm gonna do it anyway- when I walked out of the theater in September, I said "That wasn't one of the scariest horror movies that I've seen, but it's probably one of the best."  Somehow, New Line Cinema had created a horror movie that gave me very little scares, but had thoroughly entertained me and gotten me invested without camping itself out.  The characters were just too well done, and fun.  That's important- it'd be easy for a film like IT to rely entirely on the charisma of a character like Pennywise, but I think the kids in the movie easily held their own on the stage.

 Probably the biggest complaint of a horror film would be "it wasn't scary".  Tied for second place would be "I didn't even really care about the characters", and "the movie spent too much time setting up the plot with little payoff".  I see those as opposite ends of the horror spectrum when it comes to characterization, and to be successful you have to hit that sweet spot in the middle- you need to create characters that the audience cares about, while slowly ramping up the threat as the film goes on. 

This is why I don't mind a few cheap jump scares or fake scares early in the film, as long as they're not abused once the true threat emerges- they help get the audience in the mood for the scares, without ramping up the actual plot too fast.  For instance, early in the film Paranormal Activity, we hear the character Katie scream from the bathroom.   Micah (the camera-carrying husband) runs in to see the insidious form of... a spider.  Later in that film (or another in the Paranormal Activity series- honestly, they all run together) we see our cameraman slowly walking toward a closet to investigate it, only to have some family member pop out and scare them.

I know a lot of people think of those scares as "cheap", and maybe they are, but I think they're also beneficial to the film.  They buy the film a bit of time to develop characters (though, whether Paranormal Activity specifically utilized that time is up for debate) and allow the threat to have a bigger reveal later in the film, while simultaneously not completely boring an audience that is expecting a few scares.  They're the foreplay of the horror genre, if you will.  Not as fun as the main event, but hey, it gets you in the mood.

A film I watched last month did this really well.  Mark Duplass (yeah, "Tall Guy" from The League) stars in a film called Creep.  I don't want to give away too much of the plot, but it's pretty creepy- basically, the audience doesn't really know what to believe about the characters at any given time, and while things don't really ramp up into "dangerous" territory until later in the film, there's a sense of unease and vulnerability throughout the entire movie.



So anyway, I think it's pretty clear that it's incredibly difficult to tell and pace a horror film.  You have to slowly ramp up the scares, while steadily progressing the plot.  You have to have characters the audience cares about, but it doesn't really hurt to have some characters that also deserve to die.  You can add in some laughs, but be careful never to let them dominate the film.

But what does that have to do with board games?  Well, think of the horror games you've played.  Betrayal at the House on the Hill.  Dead of Winter. Eldritch Horror. Fury of Dracula. One Night Ultimate Werewolf, even. 

Have you ever been scared playing one of these games?  Sure, sometimes the text on a card in your average game of Betrayal might be a little creepy, but for the most part "fear" itself isn't what you're feeling. So, have you really been scared?

 Perhaps some of you have, but for the most part, a player's immersion into the game's world doesn't bring fear so much as a fun sense of familiarity or nostalgia. And honestly, I don't think that sense of fear is even really an expectation for gamers (well, board gamers, videogamers not so much).  We like Eldritch/Arkham Horror because they allow us to tell our own fantastic Lovecraft story.  We like Zombicide, Last Night on Earth, and Dead of Winter because we get to play out our zombie apocalypse fantasies in the comfort of our living room.  Fury of Dracula and Letters from Whitechapel allow players to track down infamous horror villains.  Perhaps explaining why it's such a popular game, Betrayal at the House on the Hill acts as a smorgasbord of almost all the horror tropes we've ever seen, ranging from aliens and zombies to an ouroboros attack.



Of course, perhaps most disturbing of all is the most cartoonish and innocuous-seeming game on this list- One Night Ultimate Werewolf.  In this game, players get to live out a brief simulation of a medieval witch hunt or werewolf/vampire scare.  Events in which, sadly, thousands upon thousands of innocents were needlessly killed due to that one emotion we've described so much during this article: fear.










May the Force be with you!

If you liked this article, give us a like on Facebook or a follow on Twitter.  Thanks!



- Thomas



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

According to Your Design: The Value of Hidden Information in Imperial Assault

There's rarely a moment in a mission of Imperial Assault where it doesn't look like the Rebel heroes aren't in a hopeless situation.  It's far too easy for them to end up outnumbered, outgunned, and surrounded.  However, even a casual player will quickly learn that any individual Rebel hero is worth far more than almost any Imperial unit, or even deployment group. So what is the Empire's advantage, then?  Tactics are certainly important, and I'm sure that over the course of this blog we'll discuss various strategic play for both sides.  But sometimes, even tactics alone won't cut it, as the game is built on a system that allows itself to be countered.  For instance, Mortar is a fantastic card in the Armored Onslaught class deck, allowing the Imperial to deal out significant splash damage each turn. While this can be devastating to the Rebels, particularly early in the match when they're all bunched up, it can be shut down by Leia's...

Profiles in Hope: Vinto Hreeda

My Rebel players generally try to pick different heroes when they start a new campaign, but there have been exactly two times that a hero has been so good that a different player selected it for the directly subsequent campaign.  The first time this happened, it was Mak, simply because one of my players mistakenly thought he seemed like a relatively straightforward shooter hero. The second time this happened, it was with Vinto Hreeda- because he's just that good. When people think of multi-target damage dealers, the prototypical example tends to be Fenn.  His splash damage is indeed pretty impressive, and can be really punishing for a careless Imperial who bunches up his units too much. But generally, Fenn isn't too terribly difficult to play around.  With Vinto, though- even with his built in abilities of Boltslinger and Thread the Needle, he can deal multi-target damage and there is nowhere to hide .  Generally, I tend to look at it this way- Fenn is a br...

Double Your Efforts: Why Imperial Assault Needs a 2nd Ed.

This week at the Hyperspace Report, Fantasy Flight Games announced a huge second edition of their popular miniatures game, X-Wing.  They appear to be taking advantage of this shift in product to address several aspects of the ambitious game, including turret tracking and faction flavor.  Best yet, conversion kits will make all previous sets compatible with the new edition. Of course, Imperial Assault could probably benefit from a new edition as well, and while in the past I've been very opposed to the idea of a new edition, the way X-Wing is being handles has won me over. Here are some arguments I'd make in support of IA 2.0 (and yes, I know some people refer to the app as that already). 1.  Errata This game is full of errata .   And that's fine, with a game this expansive and old it's to be expected.  But having all of these "hidden" rules (as in, not in official rulebooks at release that may be in a casual player's collection) means that pla...